J Appl Biomed 6:39-45, 2008 | DOI: 10.32725/jab.2008.006
Steady-state bioequivalence studies of two memantine tablet and oral solution formulations in healthy volunteers
- 1 Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic,
- 2 Pliva-LACHEMA a.s., Brno, Czech Republic
The bioavailability of memantine was compared using two tablet (Memantine LACHEMA 10 tbl. obd. and Akatinol® Memantine 10 tbl. obd., Study A) and two oral solution formulations (Memantine LACHEMA gtt. and Akatinol® Memantine gtt., Study B) containing 10 mg memantine hydrochloride in two randomized, two-period, two-sequence, crossover studies with 24 healthy volunteers. In both study periods, memantine concentrations were determined by gas-chromatography with electron-capture detection in plasma samples taken at the steady state after 22 days of once-daily dosing. The arithmetic mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters in the studies A and B were: AUC0-0τ,ss 768 (141) vs. 727 (99) and 807 (154) vs. 836 (156) ng/ml h, Cmax,ss 37.3 (6.1) vs. 35.2 (4.5) and 39.2 (7.3) vs. 40.6 (6.7) ng/ml. Median values of Tmax were in the range of 4 to 5 h. Both tablet and oral solution formulations were found bioequivalent (90%-confidence intervals for AUC0-τ,ss, Cmax,ss and Cτ,ss within 101-114% (Study A) and 92 and 104% (Study B)). For the peak-trough fluctuation, the bioequivalence intervals were 85-107% and 86-04%, respectively. By pooled analysis of both studies, the geometric mean (90% CI) relative bioavailability of memantine from tablets compared to oral solutions was 91% (85-98).
Keywords: memantine; pharmacokinetics; bioequivalence
Received: September 11, 2007; Revised: October 4, 2007; Published: March 31, 2008 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Freudenthaler S, Meineke I, Schreeb KH, Boakye E, Gundert-Remy U, Gleiter CH: Influence of urine pH and urinary flow on the renal excretion of memantine. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 46:541-546, 1998.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Hauschke D, Steinijans VW, Diletti E: A distribution-free procedure for the statistical analysis of bioequivalence studies. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Toxicol. 28:72-80, 1990.
- Kornhuber J, Kennepohl EM, Bleich S, Wiltfang J, Kraus T, Reulbach U, Meineke I: Memantine pharmacotherapy: A naturalistic study using a population pharmacokinetic approach. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 46:599-612, 2007.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Le DA, Lipton SA: Potential and current use of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists in diseases of aging. Drugs Aging 18:717-24, 2001.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Palmer GC: Neuroprotection by NMDA receptor antagonists in a variety of neuropathologies. Curr. Drug Targets 2:241-71, 2001.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Periclou A, Ventura D, Rao N, Abramowitz W: Pharmacokinetic study of memantine in healthy and renally impaired subjects. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 79:134-43, 2006.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Peskind ER, Potkin SG, Pomara N et al.: Memantine treatment in mild to moderate Alzheimer disease: a 24-week randomized, controlled trial. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 14:704-15, 2006.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Reisberg B, Doody R, Stoffler A, Schmitt F, Ferris S, Mobius HJ: A 24-week open-label extension study of memantine in moderate to severe Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol. 63:49-54, 2006.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Reisberg B, Doody R, Stoffler A, Schmitt F, Ferris S, Mobius HJ: Memantine Study Group. Memantine in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 348:1333-41, 2003.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Wesemann W, Sontag KH, Maj J: Zur Pharmakodynamik und Pharmakokinetic des Memantin. Arzneimittelforschung 33:1122-1134, 1983.
Go to original source...