J Appl Biomed 14:247-256, 2016 | DOI: 10.1016/j.jab.2016.05.002

Evaluation of mucoadhesive oral films containing nystatin

Markéta Gajdošováa, David Vetchýa,*, Petr Doležela, Jan Gajdzioka, Hana Landováa, Jan Muselíka, Jiří Zemana, Zdeněk Knotekb, Karel Hauptmanb, Vladimír Jeklb
a Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
b Avian and Exotic Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic

The aim of the presented research was the preparation and in vitro and in vivo evaluation of mucoadhesive oral films containing nystatin. Multivariate data analysis was used to evaluate an innovative approach, in which a combination of different mucoadhesive polymers was employed. The purpose of this was to assess the effects of such a combination on non-woven insoluble carmellose textile as a drug-release modifier in the structure of the film.
It was observed that the mucoadhesive films prepared using polyethylene oxide were more plastic, showed less mechanical resistance and shorter in vitro residence time in comparison with films containing sodium carmellose. The textile used in films containing sodium carmellose significantly prolonged both in vitro and in vivo residence times in rabbits from 50 ± 4 min until 74 ± 4 min and from 48 ± 6 until 80 ± 4 min, respectively. A higher degree of substitution by the acid carboxymethyl group of the textile resulted in slower nystatin dissolution, longer in vitro and in vivo residence times, and higher tensile strength. Textural parameters tensile strength and tensile deformation in conjunction with linear discriminant analysis were able to distinguish the degree of substitution of the textile due to its impact on the studied parameters.

Keywords: Films; Impregnation; Carmellose; Insoluble filler; Nystatin

Received: November 3, 2015; Revised: April 22, 2016; Accepted: May 11, 2016; Published: November 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gajdošová M, Vetchý D, Doležel P, Gajdziok J, Landová H, Muselík J, et al.. Evaluation of mucoadhesive oral films containing nystatin. J Appl Biomed. 2016;14(4):247-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jab.2016.05.002.
Download citation

References

  1. Andriole, V.T., 2000. Current and future antifungal therapy: new targets for antifungal therapy. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 16, 317-321. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Boateng, J.S., Pawar, H.V., Tetteh, J., 2013. Polyox and carrageenan based composite film dressing containing antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory drugs for effective wound healing. Int. J. Pharm. 441, 181-191. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Borges, A.F., Silva, C., Coelho, F.J., Simões, S., 2015. Oral films: current status and future perspectives I - galenical development and quality attributes. J. Control. Release 206, 1-19. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Çaykara, T., Demirci, S., Erogˇ lu, M.S., Güven, O., 2005. Poly (ethylene oxide) and its blends with sodium alginate. Polymer 46, 10750-10757. Go to original source...
  5. Chaudhary, A., Nagaich, U., Rastogi, B., 2012. Designing and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal films of propranolol hydrochloride. J. Adv. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2, 239-246. Go to original source...
  6. Dixit, R.P., Puthli, S.P., 2009. Oral strip technology: overview and future potential. J. Control. Release 139, 94-107. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Eroglu, H., Sargon, M., Oner, F.L., 2007. Chitosan formulations for steroid delivery: effect of formulation variables on in vitro characteristics. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 33, 265-271. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Fefelova, N.A., Nurkeeva, Z.S., Mun, G.A., Khutoryanskiy, V.V., 2007. Mucoadhesive interactions of amphiphilic cationic copolymers based on [2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethylammonium chloride. Int. J. Pharm. 339, 25-32. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Hassan, M.M., Durning, C.J., 1999. Effects of polymer molecular weight and temperature on case II transport. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 37, 3159-3171. Go to original source...
  10. Jekl, V., Knotek, Z., 2007. Evaluation of a laryngoscope and a rigid endoscope for the examination of the oral cavity of small mammals. Vet. Rec. 160, 9-13. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Liaw, A., Wiener, M., 2002. Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News 2, 18-22. Go to original source...
  12. Meher, J.G., Tarai, M., Yadav, N.P., Patnaik, A., Mishra, P., Yadav, K.S., 2013. Development and characterization of cellulosepolymethacrylate mucoadhesive film for buccal delivery of carvedilol. Carbohydr. Polym. 96, 172-180. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Morales, J.O., McConville, J.T., 2011. Manufacture and characterization of mucoadhesive buccal films. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 77, 187-199. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Nafee, N.A., Ismail, F.A., Boraie, N.A., Mortada, L.M., 2003. Mucoadhesive buccal patches of miconazole nitrate: in vitro/ in vivo performance and effect of ageing. Int. J. Pharm. 264, 1-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Nafee, N.A., Ismail, F.A., Boraie, N.A., Mortada, L.M., 2004. Mucoadhesive delivery systems. I. Evaluation of mucoadhesive polymers for Buccal tablet formulation. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 30, 985-993. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Okada, M., Hisajima, T., Ishibashi, H., Miyasaka, T., Abe, S., Satoh, T., 2013. Pathological analysis of the Candida albicans-infected tongue tissues of a murine oral candidiasis model in the early infection stage. Arch. Oral Biol. 58, 444-450. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Pankhurst, C.L., 2012. Candidiasis (oropharyngeal). BMJ Clin. Evid. 20 pii:1304.
  18. Pawar, H.V., Tetteh, J., Boateng, J.S., 2013. Preparation, optimisation and characterisation of novel wound healing film dressings loaded with streptomycin and diclofenac. Colloids Surf. B 102, 102-110. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Pendekal, M.S., Tegginamat, P.K., 2012. Formulation and evaluation of a bioadhesive patch for buccal delivery of tizanidine. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2, 318-324. Go to original source...
  20. Perioli, L., Ambrogi, V., Angelici, F., Ricci, M., Giovagnoli, S., Capuccella, M., Rossi, C., 2004. Development of mucoadhesive patches for buccal administration of ibuprofen. J. Control. Release 99, 73-82. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Preis, M., Woertz, C., Kleinebudde, P., Breitkreutz, J., 2013. Oromucosal film preparations: classification and characterization methods. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 10, 1303-1317. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Pohanka, M., Banďouchová, H., Vlčková, K., Karasová, J.Ž., Kuča, K., Damková, V., Pecková, L., Vitula, F., Pikula, J., 2011. Square wave voltammetry on screen printed electrodes: comparison to standard antioxidants. J. Appl. Biomed. 9, 103-109. Go to original source...
  23. Salamat-Miller, N., Chittchang, M., Johnston, T.P., 2005. The use of mucoadhesive polymers in buccal drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57, 1666-1691. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Shidhaye, S.S., Saindane, N.S., Sutar, S., Kadam, V., 2008. Mucoadhesive bilayered patches for administration of sumatriptan succinate. AAPS PharmSciTech 9, 909-916. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Shiledar, R.R., Tagalpallewar, A.A., Kokare, C.R., 2014. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of xanthan gum-based bilayered mucoadhesive buccal patches of zolmitriptan. Carbohydr. Polym. 101, 1234-1242. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Sudhakar, Y., Kuotsu, K., Bandyopadhyay, A.K., 2006. Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery - a promising option for orally less efficient drugs. J. Control. Release 114, 15-40. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Vetchý, D., Landová, H., Gajdziok, J., Doležel, P., Daněk, Z., Štembírek, J., 2014. Determination of dependencies among in vitro and in vivo properties of prepared mucoadhesive buccal films using multivariate data analysis. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 86, 498-506. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...